This Tequila Spent Its Final Year Listening to Music

image

Last modified date

A tequila barrel wearing headphones amid amber sound waves, with a psychedelic 12x75 wordmark.
Tequila / New Release

This Tequila Spent Its Final Year Listening to Music

Música Tequila is launching a 36-month Extra Añejo in November. Two years in ex-bourbon American oak, then a final year in Hungarian oak with speakers playing to the barrels. It sounds like marketing. The science is more interesting than that, and so, awkwardly, is the tequila.

By Vim, Editor of 12×75

In brief

  • Música Tequila announced its first 36-month Grand Reserva Extra Añejo on September 23, 2026, for a highly limited November release. Bottle count, price and allocation are not yet published.
  • It spends 24 months in American ex-bourbon oak and 12 months in Hungarian oak. During that final year the barrels are exposed to music, part of what the brand calls Música Audio Infusion.
  • The science: peer-reviewed work shows audible sound can affect yeast during fermentation, including a reported 23% higher growth rate and a 2026 beer study that cut fermentation by around 46 hours. Another controlled study found little consistent effect.
  • The catch: research showing acoustic energy speeds up barrel maturation used ultrasound, not speakers. Nobody has shown that a playlist next to a barrel changes a spirit.
  • The twist: Música’s existing bottles score 92 to 95 points in Wine Enthusiast’s blind tastings. Whatever the music is doing, the liquid is good.

Most Extra Añejo tequila spends three years quietly sitting in a barrel.

Música apparently thought that sounded boring.

Its newest release, a 36-month Grand Reserva announced yesterday for November, has spent the final year of its life in Hungarian oak with music playing to it. I have spent this month writing about a category that has started running its own agave school and building immersive walk-through tours of its distilleries, so a brand playing Mexican folk music to barrels is, by 2026 standards, only the third strangest thing tequila has done in a fortnight. The difference is that this one has a testable claim attached, and I went and looked at whether it holds up.

Short version: sound genuinely can affect fermentation, the evidence for barrels is much weaker than it first appears, and the tequila itself is better than the gimmick deserves. It is also, for once, a small independent doing something odd rather than another celebrity bottle, in a year when the market has started rewarding brands with a production argument. Those three things are all true at once, which is why this is more interesting than a press release.

What exactly did they play to it?

Música calls the process Audio Infusion, and it is not a one-off stunt for this bottle. Speakers sit over the open stainless-steel fermentation tanks during fermentation, and speakers are positioned around the ageing rooms and, in some cases, close to individual barrels during maturation. The brand describes itself as the world’s first music-driven tequila house, and music is the organising idea of the whole operation rather than a label story.

Música 36-Month Grand Reserva Extra Añejo

AnnouncedSeptember 23, 2026
LaunchNovember 2026, highly limited
Maturation24 months in American ex-bourbon oak, then 12 months in Hungarian oak
The musicPlayed to the barrels during the final year, inspired by Mexican musical traditions
ProducerNOM 1598, IBEV Casa Tequilera, Amatitán, Jalisco
Master tequileroHugo Yerenas Domínguez
Price, bottle count, allocationNot published at the time of writing

Sources: BevNET announcement and Música Tequila. Price and volume figures should not be assumed until the brand publishes them.

The brand’s own line for the release is three years, two woods and the music of Mexico. As a piece of copywriting that is annoyingly good. As a production note, the Hungarian oak is the part I would have led with: it is a genuinely uncommon finishing choice in tequila, tighter-grained than American oak and more associated with spice and subtler tannin, and it would be an interesting release even if the ageing room were silent.

Does playing music to tequila actually do anything?

Here is where most coverage will either mock it or repeat it. Neither is right, because there is real peer-reviewed work on sound and fermentation, and it does not say what a brand would want it to say.

There is credible evidence that sound can influence fermentation under controlled conditions. There is no good evidence that a particular playlist makes tequila taste better.

To its credit, Música is reasonably careful about this itself, acknowledging that science has not definitively shown music changes tequila fermentation or maturation while arguing that music is central to its philosophy. That is a more honest position than most brands take about their proprietary process, and it is worth saying so.

Sound can genuinely affect fermentation

The yeast evidence is real. A peer-reviewed study on Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the workhorse yeast of alcoholic fermentation, found measurable effects from specific audible frequencies: roughly 23% higher growth rate under certain acoustic conditions, along with differences in volatile metabolites and changes in some aroma-related compounds depending on the frequency used.

A newer 2026 study in Food Research International went further with beer. Researchers reported that sound in the 800 to 2,000 Hz range at 140 dB shortened fermentation by about 46 hours. The proposed mechanism is the useful detail, and it is not romantic: the acoustic energy appears to keep more yeast suspended in the liquid, and therefore active, rather than settling out. The yeast is not enjoying the music. It is being shaken.

A sense of scale. 140 dB is roughly a jet engine at close range, sustained, directly into the fermentation vessel. That is an experimental condition, not a speaker playing mariachi in a room. When you read that sound affects fermentation, check the intensity before you picture a playlist.

But the science is not settled

And then there is the study that found nothing much. A controlled experiment that transmitted sound directly through the liquid to brewing yeast reported little consistent effect on growth, sugar consumption or ethanol production. The researchers suggested that some previously reported effects may depend partly on how sound travels through the experimental setup rather than on sound changing yeast behavior directly.

That is the honest state of the field: sound can influence fermentation under some conditions, and the effect depends heavily on frequency, intensity, how the sound is transmitted and how the experiment is built. Which is a long way from proving anything about a tequila.

Speakers are not ultrasound machines

This is the distinction that matters most, and the one that would be easiest to blur.

There is genuine research showing acoustic energy can accelerate spirit maturation. One study found ultrasound treatment increased extraction of phenolic compounds from oak by roughly 34% during wine-spirit maturation. A 2024 study on ultrasound-assisted maturation of sugar-cane spirits found significant changes in color, oak-compound extraction and maturation characteristics.

Both used ultrasound: frequencies above human hearing, delivered at energy levels far beyond what a speaker produces. Citing them as evidence for music beside a barrel is like citing a pressure washer to prove that breathing on your car cleans it. The physics is related. The magnitude is not.

What the research actually shows

Supports the ideaAudible sound affects yeastA peer-reviewed study reported around 23% higher yeast growth and changes in volatile compounds at specific frequencies.
Supports the idea2026 beer studySound at 800 to 2,000 Hz and 140 dB shortened fermentation by about 46 hours, apparently by keeping yeast suspended.
Undercuts itNull resultA controlled study transmitting sound through the liquid found little consistent effect on growth, sugar use or ethanol.
Does not applyUltrasound maturation studiesRoughly 34% more phenolic extraction from oak, and significant changes in sugar-cane spirit maturation, but using ultrasound rather than audible music.

Conclusion: scientists have shown acoustic energy can affect fermentation and even spirit maturation. Nobody has demonstrated that putting a playlist beside a tequila barrel produces the same result.

One more caution. Música has referenced the Mozart Effect in explaining the concept, and the Mozart Effect is one of the most over-extended findings in popular science. It does not establish that Mozart, mariachi, techno or anything else reliably changes the flavor of a spirit. Use it as a metaphor by all means. It is not evidence.

The tequila itself is not a gimmick

Now the part that complicates the easy joke. Strip the speakers out and Música is a serious small producer, and the production notes read like a brand that would be worth attention without any of the music.

How it is made

Agave100% Blue Weber from the Zona Valles and Amatitán area, typically eight to ten years old at harvest
CookingLow-pressure autoclave
ExtractionFive-stage roller mill
FermentationOpen stainless steel, using naturally occurring environmental yeast rather than commercial cultures
DistillationDouble distilled in stainless-steel pot stills with copper components
AdditivesMúsica says its tequila is produced without additives

Source: Música Tequila. Production details are the producer’s own statements.

Open fermentation with ambient yeast is the detail I would pick out. It is harder to control and less predictable than pitching a commercial strain, and it is the sort of choice made by people who care how the thing tastes rather than how consistently it can be scaled. If you want to know why any of that matters, how tequila is made walks through each stage.

On the additive-free claim. Música says it makes its tequila without additives, and I am reporting that as the producer’s statement rather than as verified fact. That is not a slight on Música; it is the standard I apply to every brand since the additives argument became a legal question. Independent verification is a separate thing, and the bottles that have it are on my additive-free list.

The 36 months also has a regulatory meaning worth stating plainly: under Mexican rules, Extra Añejo requires a minimum of three years in oak or holm-oak vessels of no more than 600 liters. So Música’s 36 months places it exactly at the category threshold rather than beyond it. If you want the full picture of what the class names mean, blanco, reposado and añejo covers it.

The scores make the joke harder to tell

Here is the inconvenient fact for anyone planning to write this off. Wine Enthusiast, whose Buying Guide spirits tastings are conducted blind, has scored Música’s existing range well.

Wine Enthusiast, blind-tasted

Añejo95
Blues Reserva Añejo94
Blanco93
Reposado92

Wine Enthusiast, blind-tasted. It lists the Añejo at around $70 and the Blues Reserva Añejo at about $99. External critic scores, quoted as theirs, not mine.

Blind tastings do not know about speakers. A panel scoring 95 points has no idea whether the liquid spent a year listening to Vicente Fernández or to the hum of a warehouse fan, which is exactly what makes those numbers useful. They do not prove the music does anything. They do prove that whatever else is going on at NOM 1598, somebody there can make tequila.

The production story would be easy to dismiss as marketing, except the blind tastings keep coming back at 92 to 95 points.

Who is behind it

Música was founded by Chris and Geri Andrews and launched commercially in 2024 after several years of development, working with master tequilero Hugo Yerenas Domínguez and his family at NOM 1598 in Amatitán. Chris Andrews’ background spans engineering, music and music production; Geri’s covers finance, marketing and product development.

That matters for judging whether the concept is sincere. The music idea predates this release and runs through the whole brand, and the company sponsors musicians and supports the Save The Music Foundation. This is not a marketing department that discovered a hook last spring. It is a couple who like music building a tequila around it, which is a considerably more sympathetic proposition than most brand stories I read, and a long way from the celebrity model the category spent a decade on.

It is also still a small operation. Música’s own retail information points to meaningful physical distribution in Florida and Michigan, plus online sales into other markets where permitted. If you are outside those states, the Grand Reserva will likely mean the brand’s website or nothing, and “highly limited” usually means exactly what it says.

So should you buy it?

I have not tasted it, and nobody has, because it launches in November. So treat this as a reasoned guess rather than a review.

What I would say is that the reasons to be interested are not the reasons in the press release. A 36-month Extra Añejo finished for a year in Hungarian oak, from a producer whose current range blind-scores in the low to mid nineties, made with ambient-yeast open fermentation, is a genuinely interesting bottle. The music is the marketing. The wood, the yeast and the track record are the product. If the price lands sensibly, and the brand has not published one yet, it is worth a look for anyone who has worked through the obvious names in the best tequila guide and wants something with an actual point of view.

And if it lands at a silly number because it is limited and has a story, that is a different conversation, and the one I keep having about bottles priced for the shelf rather than the glass. I will update this when the price appears, and again if I get a bottle in a glass.

The last word

Whether Música’s tequila tastes different because it spent a year listening to music is, at the moment, impossible to prove. The fermentation science is real but tested at intensities no ageing room reproduces. The maturation science is real but used ultrasound. The brand itself admits the case is not settled. And the blind scores, which are the only evidence that touches the actual liquid, cannot tell you which part of the process earned them.

What I can say is that a small family brand doing something odd and sincere, and being honest about the limits of its own claim, is a considerably better story than another gold bottle with a famous name on it. The category could do with more of it.

If you are going to spend three years inside a barrel, there are worse ways to pass the time.

Sources

Production details, the additive-free claim and process descriptions are Música Tequila’s own statements, reported as such. Scores are Wine Enthusiast’s, from blind tastings, and are quoted rather than endorsed. The scientific studies cited concern fermentation and maturation under laboratory conditions and do not demonstrate any effect from music played beside tequila barrels. Price, bottle count and allocation had not been published at the time of writing. Correct as of September 24, 2026. Please drink responsibly.